<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the difference between RDFa vs Microformats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kelpdesign.com/tech-talk/rdfa-vs-microformats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kelpdesign.com/tech-talk/rdfa-vs-microformats/</link>
	<description>We build easy to manage websites.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.kelpdesign.com/tech-talk/rdfa-vs-microformats/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kelpdesign.com/?p=431#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I have been reading about this all night trying to decide which one to use.  To me Micoroformats seem a lot easier to use.  When I first started looking at it it was much more intuitive for me to use that one, at least as it relates to basic things.  But it seems that as it evolves over time that RDFa will have more flexibility and be adopted more widely.  Still as a development company it is our intent to support both until there is a different option.  Both meaning one or the other on a particular site, not both at the same time on the same site hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading about this all night trying to decide which one to use.  To me Micoroformats seem a lot easier to use.  When I first started looking at it it was much more intuitive for me to use that one, at least as it relates to basic things.  But it seems that as it evolves over time that RDFa will have more flexibility and be adopted more widely.  Still as a development company it is our intent to support both until there is a different option.  Both meaning one or the other on a particular site, not both at the same time on the same site hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semantic Markup Tag Reference &#171; Webpage Designer Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.kelpdesign.com/tech-talk/rdfa-vs-microformats/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Semantic Markup Tag Reference &#171; Webpage Designer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kelpdesign.com/?p=431#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] What&#8217;s the difference between RDFa vs Microformats? &#124; kelpdesign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What&#8217;s the difference between RDFa vs Microformats? | kelpdesign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hausenblas</title>
		<link>http://www.kelpdesign.com/tech-talk/rdfa-vs-microformats/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hausenblas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kelpdesign.com/?p=431#comment-69</guid>
		<description>... an additional bullet point for your further reading:

http://bnode.org/blog/2007/02/12/comparison-of-microformats-erdf-and-rdfa

Cheers,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; an additional bullet point for your further reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://bnode.org/blog/2007/02/12/comparison-of-microformats-erdf-and-rdfa" rel="nofollow">http://bnode.org/blog/2007/02/12/comparison-of-microformats-erdf-and-rdfa</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

